Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Lie, Lie, Lie..Your Partner May Love You More Because Of It.


"Darlin, how does this dress look on me?" One of the questions or something similar to it, that most if not all romantic relationships are confronted with. How is the man in this situation supposed to respond? Should he be completely upfront and honest or should he use flattery and lie a little to protect her feelings? This conundrum may be a simple one for the fella, if she in fact looks amazing in the aforementioned dress, or he atleast personally thinks she does. The man could even be strategic in his response with grey area, ambiguous, off-the-hook answers; He could say something like, "you look great in anything, dear." or "whatever you feel comfortable in, babe". Most people believe lying is always bad; but is it? If the man in this example were to tell the honest truth about how his partner looks in the dress, he could risk hurting her feelings and in turn damaging the relationship.

 

The folks who believe lying is never good, are probably people with no friends. Sometimes a person must lie in order to spare the feelings of someone they care about. This idea never fully settles with my conscious and personal beliefs on deception and lies, I guess that’s why have I have such few friends...hmm. Deception scholars have titled the practice of lying in order to protect others as deceptive affection. This is just as the slogan says, affection? Researchers Horan and Booth-Butterfield in 2010, after their study on what’s worth lying for, came to the conclusion that deceptive affection may not necessarily have a negative impact on relationships. This deception can in turn be an effective ‘tool’ to avoid problems and issues and actually may strengthen romantic relationships.

 

So if some deception in relationships can be viewed as affection, then what other kinds of lying can be deemed socially acceptable? When the man from the dress example is confronted with another tough question by his partner similar to; “have you ever had sex with anyone I know?” What should he do? Should he tell his current partner something like this in response?

 

“Yes honey, I have had great sex with three people you know, but don’t you worry your pretty lil’ heart out, it was long before we were together.”

 

This truthful answer could and certainly would have a negative effect on his relationship. His partner might then begin to wonder things like; how great the 3 were exactly, if they were better than her, if her man still thinks about them, if he fantasizes about them while making love to her, if he wants to be with them instead of her. The woman then also may vent and stew on the thought of him being with another woman to the point the relationship becomes doomed. So this is another example of lying to protect, but it is also deception to protect privacy. These are both forms of socially acceptable lies according to a 2002 study by Seiter, Bruschke, and Bai. The privacy being protected in this example was not only the man’s, but also the former lovers the woman was inquiring about. The three women’s reputations, amongst other things, deserve protection as well. The three social science researchers called this form of deception, competent communication.

 

            Seiter, Brushke, and Bai also looked at the differences between socially acceptable and unacceptable deception. If lying to benefit others or protect privacy is deemed acceptable then lying for selfish or exploitive reasons is considered socially unacceptable in romantic relationships. The man lying about how his wife looks in the dress, would be in the wrong according to society, if he told his partner she looked amazing in order to receive sexy-time in the form of sexual intercourse with her. He would also be looked down upon by society if he responded to the question of previous sexual partners, with a lie in order to dodge the question in hopes that his wife might fix his favorite dinner on that evening. This brings up what the three researchers found as their number one factor in determining what deception is acceptable and what is not; motive. A person’s intention or driving force motivation for lying in relationships is what research shows as its acceptability factor.

 

Before you lie to your partner next (because we all know you will, even it’s a “white” affectionate lie) maybe you should stop to think what your driving-motive is. If your motive is clear and unacceptable to YOU, then do not go forward with your deception. And if you feel your partner may be lying to you, try to assess their motivations, because it may be in fact to protect you. I was next to a guy on an airplane once who was writing a song called “lies lead to love”, by god he may have brilliantly been on to something.

 

 

Mike Polotto

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Deception in Sexual History Disclosure


Mike Polotto

Research Question:

What do romantic relationship partners most often deceive each other about? (ever-changing)

 

                Since I was a teenager I have heard the unwritten “rule of thirds” when it comes to disclosing the amount of sexual partners a person has been with.  This ‘rule’ has haunted me and had me questioning the truthfulness of just about every lover I’ve had in the beginning disclosure stages of our relationships. I can remember when I was 19 I fell for this adorable and ridiculously sweet cheerleader at my first college. She seemed completely trustable and credible with everything she did or said. Then the often dreadful conversation of past sexual history came up. I told her my number with complete honesty because I had no shame. She then responded with her number, 4. I trusted her disclosure was honest and we continued our relationship. A few days later one of my friends reminded me of this ‘rule’ and that I should multiply her number by 3 and that will help me reach the truth about her past history. This idea ate me up to the point of exhaustion and I was internally forced to end the relationship. Obviously this ‘times-3’ notion is not scientifically proven but yet its effects can be brutal. It was been portrayed in popular movies and television shows however, so that in turn means it certainly must be fact…right?

                In romantic relationships the disclosing of sexual history can be an issue that either adds to, or breaks down the growth of the particular relationship. It has been a hot-button of deception concerning romantic partners since Adam met Eve (obviously this is an exaggeration because they were both virgins).  There have been numerous studies which have analyzed the ideas of sexual disclosure. Anne Luchetti led one of these to explore deception on the topic. She placed the disclosure under two categories; “the need to reveal”, and the “need to conceal”.

                Safe-sex comes in many forms nowadays; the “need to reveal” is considered one of them. It is seen as trusting your partner enough to disclose potentially risky sexual history. This empowers your partner with helpful information that allows them to make up their own mind about continuing with the relationship in regards to sexual practices. Luchetti also analyzed the “need to conceal”; this is a form of protecting oneself in sexual history disclosure. The ‘concealer’ may be worried their upfront honesty could lead to embarrassment and potentially harm the relationship in its development stages. They also may feel their sexual history is irrelevant to their current situation so why reveal potentially harmful material. This is a form privacy protection in the early realms of a romantic relationship.

                Another study done by researcher Wendy L. Nichols of Marrimack College also looked into protection of one’s privacy in sexual history disclosure.  She found that the person who feels they have the complete right to control and regulate their sexual information history may feel they are free to regulate access to it as well. These folks believe this form of information isn’t necessary history their partner is entitled to know. Nichols found that this type of concealment does in fact fall under the label of deception. Is holding back of information in, romantic relationships, which could potentially harm your partner in fact deceiving them?

                The obsession with sexual partner numbers is no doubt and issue that affects romantic relationships. We as individuals in romantic dyads must learn to weigh our own pros and cons, positives and negatives, as well as levels of security in our own personal relationships. We should work to ignore the social pressures and media representations of how relationships ‘ought to be’, and take control of who, what, and when we are happy and satisfied. If we are comfortable with our partners then we should work to trust them until there is an upfront issue that makes that no longer possible. Who your lover was with in the past, or the amount of people they have been with, should not hold weight in your decision to continue developing the relationship or end it. We all have a past we cannot change; we should not waste precious energies attempting to worry about ours or others. We have a future that requires the necessary attention in order to reach the satisfaction we all deserve. Focus on tomorrow and yesterday is but a memory.